Tuesday, December 21, 2021

Revolvers Are Great: Revolver vs. Autoloader for CCW (Part 3)

Differences. It's all about the differences.

Will You Carry It?

It's all about size, weight, ease of concealment, and feeling comfortable with the damn thing. All of the above could be a deal breaker. Two people could buy the same 16 ounce revolver and have two different outcomes as far as being willing to carry the gun. Different modes of carry affect how it prints and feels. People are shaped differently. 

There are so many factors, but different holsters can mitigate any issues. So I believe that choosing between a revolver and a semiauto will depend on other factors more than exact comfort. I could be wrong, especially when someone that wears more form fitting clothes has to make a choice, which means more concern about comfort and printing. 

Training Up

Revolvers seem to provide more of an "easy entry" path to conceal carry. Checking to see if a gun is loaded and basic functions seem so obvious and intuitive with a revolver. That's why gun-store clerks seem to naturally try to put snubnose revolvers in the hands of women. Small revolvers can be a handle to shoot, but so can the lightweight .380s. 

Of course, the modern "troupe" is that you can getting anyway hitting the target, if you hand them a Glock G19. But I am not so sure that they wont' be shooting themselves in the thigh, if they take such an easy-to-shoot gun as their CCW gat.

So a revolver seems to be harder to shoot accurately. That probably is mitigated, because most non-LEO legal carriers will have to defend themselves at close range. But again, the semiauto has another advantage, mostly. Because of the long double-action trigger of revolvers, a person with an autoloader can most likely get their shots on target quicker. But then again, that is probably not needed.

For a more in-depth look at the differences between proficiency with an autoloader and a revolver, here is a video by Caleb Gidding:  

Ammo Cost

Ammo cost doesn't seem to a big deal, if you're just going to get a gun and not shoot it until you need it. But that doesn't seem very responsible. My wife wants to learn about handguns, get her CCW permit, and shoot regularly. And I want to shoot more. I'm of the opinion that you should shoot with your carry gun with carry ammo (at least analog, which ammo companies are capitalizing on) - NOT .22s or easier-to-shoot larger guns - at least when you are practicing for carrying.

So, practice costs money for range time and ammo.

(brass-cased FMJ 50 round box - 12/13/21 on LuckyGunner.com)

9mm        $23.50

.380        $37.00 (57% more)

.38 Special    $38.00 (62% more)

9mm wins this category on a round by round basis. But how many rounds would you put through a CCW gun at all - or in each caliber?

A Gun Is A Gun

Eventually, you have to make a choice. The conventional wisdom is that autoloaders have won the fight, but revolvers can ease an entry into CCW. And if one can handle the trigger pull and recoil - and make hits on target at typical non-LEO civilian ranges - then a revolver is good enough. So be it.

Monday, December 13, 2021

Kel-Tec's Chassis-System Pistol

Who knew that Kel-Tec has a pistol in it's line up that uses a serialized chassis instead of a serialized frame? Well, I did, sort of.

Credit: KelTecWeapons.com

A few years ago, I saw that the PF-9's serial number was on the back of the gun, and it appeared not to be on the polymer grip frame. So, I looked a little further, and walla! - I found nothing. So the thought of being able to easily, and without a transfer "tax" slipped from my mind.
credit: UBuy.gr

Last week, my wife said once again that she wants to get her CCW and a small pistol. .380 would be most practical size wise, but 9 mm is always more available. So I've been looking at all kinds of guns, and of course I drifted back to the absolutely lightest pistol (not revolver) - not the smallest one (that might be the Kahr CM9/PM9) - the Kel-Tec PF-9.

Then I started looking for recent, good video  reviews of and comparisons with the PF-9. There aren't many. Then I stumbled on the a recent video about the P11 - the original double stack micro 9. Which made me check Kel-Tec's sight for dimension info, and naturally to their "so long" video for the P11. Which is on You Tube, on Kel-Tec's channel. So I started scrolled and stumbled on this, their video for switching the grim frame of the PF-9.

Wait a cotton picking minute! That's a chassis system, but ...

If you watch the video, then you realize that taking the gun apart and putting it back together could be a comedy of errors. Stuff can fall off the chassis, and there is a distinct possibility that you will assemble a nonfunctioning pistol - if you're not careful. 

And what is the advantage for you to switch grip frames with the PF-9?: (1) Change colors. (2) replace a broken grip frame without having to retransfer your firearm

So for the earliest chassis-system pistol that I know of, Kel-Tec has done a piss-poor job of capitalizing on it. Could they already have done a slim double-stack modern micro 9?

Sunday, December 12, 2021

Clicky.com

Real Time Web Analytics