Monday, August 31, 2020

Biden On Script

 

Biden is incapable of talking off script, and the script is wrong.

He should be declared legally incompetent at the petition of his wife.

Joe Biden has some form of dimentia that makes him unable to lead. If elected, his handlers will lead the government as long as he is president. 

Rampant Crime = Police Brutality Fix

Intimidation, assaults, rioting, looting, vandalism, battery, arson, attempted murder, and murders, among other crimes like conspiracy, have definitely led to a willingness among police and, well, just the rest of us to have a conversation about the wholesale slaughter of peaceful blacks by law enforcement.


You don't believe that do you? Tell me you don't believe that.

Saturday, July 11, 2020

Good Goya


“'You’re allowed to talk good or to praise one president but you’re not allowed — when I was called to be part of this commission to aid in economic and educational prosperity, and you make a positive comment, all of the sudden that’s not acceptable,' Unanue continued, who has also worked with former President Barack Obama."

“'I’m not apologizing for saying,' he said. 'Especially if you’re called by the President of the United States, you’re going to say, ‘No, I’m sorry, I’m busy, no thank you?’ I didn’t say that to the Obamas and I didn’t say that to President Trump.'"  (The Daily Wire 7/11/20)


Wednesday, June 3, 2020

LEO to PO

Hypothesis: The shift from police being peace officers to law-enforcement officers, along with the explosion of victimless "crimes," has diluted justice and "criminalized" daily life. Crime would decrease and freedom would increase, if police return to preventing violence and theft.

Overreaction

The death of George Floyd is another indication that law enforcement officers (LEOs) should once again be replaced by peace officers (POs). Yes, Floyd was accused of theft for allegedly passing a counterfeit $20 bill, so in my interpretation of what "peace officers" should be responsible for, the police officers in this case were serving the good by capturing a suspected thief. But they failed at the most important part of their jobs - keeping the peace. What could the police officers have done differently?

Well first, what did Floyd do that drew a violent response? He honestly or deceptively had a claustrophobic panic response to getting in the the back of the police car handcuffed. His refusal could have been construed as resisting arrest by the police officers, which it appears would be a reasonable assumption. Again, what could the police officers have done differently?:

1. Was there an option of placing the suspect in a police van instead of the backseat of a patrol car?

2. Could he have been hogtied to restrict his movements?

3. Could the police officers have offered to issue a summons for such a misdemeanor?

4. Even with the constraints of the method they used to detain Floyd, there appears to have been no need to restrict the movement of Floyd's head, constrict his neck, or hold him chest down for the length of time that the police officers did. Even one officer suggested that Floyd be turned on his side, because it was apparently against police-department police for a suspect to be held on his chest for any length of time. And apparently Chauvin refused.

Judge Chauvin

The violent - yes, violent - arrest of George Floyd points to a disturbing trend in policing. The one "law" that cops enforce the most is "contempt of cop." And then there is the militarization of policing.

Whether Floyd resisted or not, Chauvin made a decision at some point to "punish" Floyd. It seems impossible to believe that Chauvin didn't know for at least 3 minutes that Floyd was unconscious. To keep Floyd in a prone position with 3 men kneeling on him showed a reckless disregard for human life, especially by Chauvin with his knee on Floyd's neck.

According to the medical examiner, Chauvin did not strangle Floyd to death. But that does not mean that Chauvin didn't murder Floyd. If a perp shot an elderly man, and the senior dies of a stroke after being shot, did the criminal not murder the victim?

Chauvin might not have the same disregard for life as Judge Dredd, but Chauvin did nothing to protect the life in his custody.

NOTE: Now the medical examiner has released a new statement, and it has been determine that Floyd was strangled at least on one side of his neck.

Police Militarization

The easiest way to see the militarization of police is the equipment. Often when people described the militarization of police they referencece the tool kit:

  1. Mine-resistant armored personnel carriers
  2. Body armor
  3. Shields
  4. Helmets
  5. Semiautomatic rifles
  6. Multiple magazines

But what I find more disturbing is the mindset. "Civilians" is a poisonous word. Often you hear police juxtaposed with civilians. But cops are also civilians. They are not separate or above us. They are there to serve other civilians. Where did the mindset that cops are separate from us come from?

The enforcement of victimless laws will be death of real peace and real laws

Friday, April 10, 2020

The Declaration of Independence: Full Text

The Declaration of Independence – Full Text


IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:
Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton
North Carolina: William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn
South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton
Massachusetts: John Hancock
Maryland: Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia: George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton
Pennsylvania: Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross
Delaware: Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean
New York: William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris
New Jersey: Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark
New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple
Massachusetts: Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery
Connecticut: Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire: Matthew Thornton

Monday, March 30, 2020

Federal Coronavirus Response

I don't know who the hell these people are. Birx, Fauci - who are they? Who are the major players in the fight against the Wuhan Virus (aka COVID-19, coronavirus, Chinese Virus, Xi Cold)?


White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator 

Tuesday, March 17, 2020

If The Name Fits: Coronavirus Edition

COVID-19 is STILL in search of a good name.

The World Health Organization (WHO) relatively quickly let Wuhan off the hook. The virus started in the metropolis of Wuhan in the populous province of Hubei. But COVID-19 sounds like a WWII prisoner-war prison camp for Allied aviators, so everyone is still running around calling illness "coronavirus." That's all well and good, but coronavirus is a class of viruses that include the generally-just-annoying common cold.

Well, we have a pandemic virus that has been  world renown for almost two months. Pandemics could get their names from place of origin or as suspected place of origin, for example "Wuhan Virus," "Wet Market Virus," or "Spanish Flu." Pandemics could get their names from the source animal, such as the "Bird Flu," "Swine Flu," or "Bat Virus." Pandemics could get their names from the people who discover or help publicize them or were courageous in fighting them, for example "Alzheimer's disease," "salmonella," or "Li Virus" (in honor of the doctor who was muzzled by the government in China and later died from COVID-19).

So, what about the villains? "Hallervorden-Spatz disease" is named after two doctors, one of which was a Nazi doctor who was directly responsible for the murder of 60 children. What if COVID-19 was names after those responsible for,it going pandemic? It would be easy to name the coronavirus after General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Xi Jinping and called it "Xi Virus," but who can pronounce his name? Talking heads say it on the news from time to time, so it is possible for the name to catch on. How do you say it? "Zzee?" "She's? "She?" "See?" "Hsi?" What is he called?

But is Xi singularly responsible for the spread of the disease? How 'bout "Politburo Pandemic?" "Authoritarian Virus?" "PRC Virus?" "Central Virus 2?" What are the colloquial and official names of the central power in China? Its the Communist Party led by the - 

Oh, who the he'll cares!?! It's the "Xi Cold!" Say it however the hell you want.

Wednesday, March 11, 2020

ATI Nomad: Ordered



A while back, I started looking for a "camper" gun - something cheap, simple, stowable to have in our popup camper, when our family of five is out in the woods. I forgot about that.

More recently, I wanted to get a shotgun again. I had sold my Remington 870 several years ago, and I am sitting on a pile of shells. My birthday was looming, I was asked what I wanted, I said it was a cheap shotgun, that didn't work out, but I received a gift card to one of our local gun stores/ranges. The gift card has sat in my bedside table since October, but in the meantime I ran across the ATI Nomad shotgun series.

I had looked at the Midland Backpacker single-shot shotguns, but I was waiting for Midland to also come out with their promises promised rifle barrels for the gun. I even considered the Wal-Mart special - The Hatfield single shot.


On a whim, I pulled up the ATI Nomad 18.5" 12 gauge on Gallery of Guns. The price was amazing $83 plus tax and fees brought it to $99 out the door (the listing claims no transfer fee, but I'm suspicious). And low and behold, the first retailer offering the gun is the one I have the gift card for.

So the gun is coming my way.

NEXT: Nomad Unboxing



Tuesday, March 3, 2020

Pandemic IN China

NEXT IN SERIES: If The Name Fits ...

Hypothesis: Covid-19 (aka coronavirus, Wuhan virus) spread had become a pandemic BEFORE it left the borders of China.

Pandemic (n.): 
(1) (of a disease) prevalent over a whole country or the world. (Google)
(2) an outbreak of a disease that occurs over a wide geographic area and affects an exceptionally high proportion of the population : a pandemic outbreak of a disease. (Merriam Webster)
(3) A pandemic (from Greek Ï€á¾¶Î½ pan "all" and δῆμος demos "people") is an epidemic of disease that has spread across a large region; for instance multiple continents, or worldwide. (Wikipedia)

So on the balance a widespread disease that has ONLY occurred in "mainland" China could be considered a "pandemic."
Also, the sheer numbers of people and internal border controls in China make a spread within its population equivalent to a spread over multiple  international borders. For example:

Hubei Province has 58 million citizens, which equivalent to the populations of England or Burma. Hubei is the center of the outbreak with Wuhan being epicenter and multiple other populations centers effected. Thousands of people have been infected in multiple provinces.

Given that a pandemic really had already occurred WITHIN the borders of China with epidemics in multiple locations, the World Health Organization is irresponsible for pussy footing around the definition of a pandemic and failing to declare a pandemic. 

Also, when the virus actually did present itself as pandemic across traditional international boundaries, the WHO was grossly negligent  by using politically-correct, non-triggering language. Actually, China and the WHO were negligent, when COVID-19 was only confirmed within the borders of Hubei. 

In the past, pandemics spread relatively slowly. The plague took years. The Spanish Flu took many months. Now with international trade and leisure travel available to the masses, and since the masses are so much more massive, the response to biological threats needs to more rapid and sophisticated. 

COVID-19 took one month to become a epidemic, another month to become an intranational pandemic, and another month to become an international pandemic.

Yes, the response to this threat is better than even SARS, but  systems we have in place are still dependent on the fears and ambitions of the individuals implementing them.

Clicky.com

Real Time Web Analytics